Initial evaluation of the Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire - 2

Greater acceptance of chronic pain is associated with lesser levels of pain-related distress and disability and better overall functioning. Pain acceptance is most often assessed using the Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire (CPAQ), which includes both an eight-item short form (CPAQ-8) and a twenty item parent measure (CPAQ-20). This study derived a two-item CPAQ for use in busy clinical settings and for repeated measurement during treatment, the CPAQ-2. An Item Response Theory (IRT) approach was used to identify the strongest items from the CPAQ-20, one from each of its two subscales. Next, regression analyses were conducted to evaluate the utility of the CPAQ-2 by examining variance accounted for in the CPAQ-8, CPAQ-20, and in measures of depression, pain-related fear, physical disability, and psychosocial disability. Four clinical databases were combined (N = 1,776) for the analyses. Items 9 and 14 were identified as the strongest CPAQ-20 items in the IRT analyses. The sum score of these two items accounted for over 60% of the variance in the CPAQ-8 and CPAQ-20. Furthermore, this score accounted for significant variance in measures of depression, pain-related fear, physical disability, and psychosocial disability after controlling for data collection method (i.e. in clinic or online), participant age, education, pain duration and usual pain. Finally, the amount of variance accounted for by the CPAQ-2 was comparable to that accounted for by both the CPAQ-8 and CPAQ-20. These results provide initial support for the CPAQ-2 and suggest that it is well-suited as a brief assessment of chronic pain acceptance. SIGNIFICANCE: The most frequently used measure of pain acceptance is the CPAQ, which includes both an eight-item short form, the CPAQ-8, and a longer twenty item parent measure, the CPAQ-20. The present study sought to derive a two-item measure of the CPAQ for use in busy clinical settings and for repeated measurement during treatment, the CPAQ-2. An IRT approach was used to identify the strongest items from the CPAQ-20, one from each of its two subscales in a large sample of 1,776 individuals with chronic pain. The two item measure accounted for significant variance in measures of depression, pain-related fear, physical disability, and psychosocial disability. The brief measure will be useful in assessing pain acceptance in busy clinical setting and longitudinal designs.

© 2020 The Authors. European Journal of Pain published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Pain Federation - EFIC ®.

Comment in

Van Ryckeghem DML. Van Ryckeghem DML. Eur J Pain. 2021 Jan;25(1):3-4. doi: 10.1002/ejp.1672. Epub 2020 Nov 11. Eur J Pain. 2021. PMID: 33037708 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

Similar articles

Baranoff J, Hanrahan SJ, Kapur D, Connor JP. Baranoff J, et al. Int J Behav Med. 2014 Feb;21(1):177-85. doi: 10.1007/s12529-012-9278-6. Int J Behav Med. 2014. PMID: 23179676

Gauntlett-Gilbert J, Alamire B, Duggan GB. Gauntlett-Gilbert J, et al. J Pediatr Psychol. 2019 May 1;44(4):453-462. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsy090. J Pediatr Psychol. 2019. PMID: 30496433

Fish RA, Hogan MJ, Morrison TG, Stewart I, McGuire BE. Fish RA, et al. J Pain. 2013 Mar;14(3):233-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2012.11.004. J Pain. 2013. PMID: 23452647

Kim S, Kratz AL. Kim S, et al. Rehabil Psychol. 2021 Feb;66(1):102-105. doi: 10.1037/rep0000342. Rehabil Psychol. 2021. PMID: 33591792 Review.

Reneman MF, Dijkstra A, Geertzen JH, Dijkstra PU. Reneman MF, et al. Eur J Pain. 2010 May;14(5):457-65. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2009.08.003. Epub 2009 Oct 9. Eur J Pain. 2010. PMID: 19819172 Review.

Cited by

Tan BY, Goh ZZS, Lim CJ, Pereira MJ, Yang SY, Tan KG, Tan ACK, Liang P, Abbott JH, Briggs AM, Hunter DJ, Skou ST, Thumboo J, Car J. Tan BY, et al. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023 Feb 7;24(1):104. doi: 10.1186/s12891-023-06207-1. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023. PMID: 36750930 Free PMC article.

Van Ryckeghem DML. Van Ryckeghem DML. Eur J Pain. 2021 Jan;25(1):3-4. doi: 10.1002/ejp.1672. Epub 2020 Nov 11. Eur J Pain. 2021. PMID: 33037708 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

References

REFERENCES

    1. American Psychiatric Association (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
    1. Baranoff, J., Hanrahan, S. J., Kapur, D., & Connor, J. P. (2014). Validation of the Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire-8 in an Australian pain clinic sample. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 21, 177-185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12529-012-9278-6
    1. Bergner, M., Bobbitt, R. A., Carter, W. B., & Gilson, B. S. (1981). The sickness impact profile: Development and final revision of a health status measure. Medical Care, 19, 787-805. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005650-198108000-00001
    1. Burns, J. W., Glenn, B., Bruehl, S., Harden, R. N., & Lofland, K. (2003). Cognitive factors influence outcome following multidisciplinary chronic pain treatment: A replication and extension of a cross-lagged panel analysis. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 41, 1163-1182. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7967(03)00029-9
    1. Burns, J. W., Kubilus, A., Bruehl, S., Harden, R. N., & Lofland, K. (2003). Do changes in cognitive factors influence outcome following multidisciplinary treatment for chronic pain? A cross-lagged panel analysis. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 71, 81-91. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.71.1.81